The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep The major problem with the article is lack of notability information in the article itself. Discussion indicates that the subject itself is somewhat notable, though it too is lacking in specifics. Saligron09:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - it may not be as well known as some languages, but with over 5 million users of applications written in the language and over $5 billion in annual sales by partners using the language, it is certainly significant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tamhas (talk • contribs) 22:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Strong delete At least while the article contains no claim to notability. In fact at present I think it qualifies for speedy delete (A7)... --BozMotalk10:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.