The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy Analytics

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find in depth coverage (more than a sentence) that isn't a press release or based off of one. Fails WP:NCORP, especially WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the sources are reliable of significant. - Mar11 (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam; borders on G11 with WP:SPIP sourcing and promo content. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.