The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fails notability per WP:CRYSTAL. May be recreated when the movie is released. Malinaccier (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Protection Program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Forthcoming made for cable movie. Needs substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. None provided. I was able to find this blurb in etonline, but with virtually no content about the movie itself. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Crystal balling, and has no notability (even if just not yet). -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:CRYSTAL. Fails WP:MOVIE. Maybe a few months down the road or whenever the movie is released the article's subject will be notable enough to warrant an article. For now, delete. Calor (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As above. Couldn't have said it better. --Ebyabe (talk) 22:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: there is no real reason to delete this article if no one believes it then they can just click away from the page. this is a movie coming out soon and some people like me what to know what it is about because we just heard about it. so please do not delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.219.67 (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC) — 76.191.219.67 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Comment - The reason to delete it is that it fails notability guidelines. To keep the article, you need to show that it meets guidelines or provide sound reasons for ignoring the guidelines in this case. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The movie is only 4 months away and it has reliable sources. --72.234.211.105 (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - It does not currently have reliable sources. The only source listed is a youtube link, possibly a copyright violation and certainly not a "reliable sources that (is) independent of the subject". It also links to an imdb page, which is not a reliable source. It fails WP:MOVIE. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The article now has 3 reliable sources! Beat that:) --DCFan101 (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable until it's released. Stifle (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.