The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect to Michael Jackson. redirected, but history deleted as poorly sourced. Cirt (talk) 02:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Michael Jackson ll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notable only for being the son of Michael Jackson. Especially for a young child, there's no reason for us to have this article. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Michael Jackson (eesh, that sounds dirty), nothing worth keeping in a solo article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Michael Jackson, standard course of action for relatives of notable people who get incidental media mentions. --Chiliad22 (talk) 21:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, as Chiliad22 pointed out. --Julle (talk) 23:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notability is not inherited. At worst, redirect as suggested. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - filled with BLP violations; unlikely to become notable on his own any time soon. Bearian (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete:Per all above.--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.