The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Albert of Schaumburg-Lippe

[edit]
Prince Albert of Schaumburg-Lippe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Sourced solely to directories and online family history self-published websites. DrKay (talk) 19:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, should not be deleted. the Prince Albert of Schaumburg-Lippe is a historical person and is of interest for a online bibliotheca like Wikipedia. --92.76.102.53 (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very little of the article is actually about him, as opposed to his relatives.2601:249:9301:D570:F866:765C:D649:10D (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't find that he would be notable for something other than his family tree. His only page on other wikis is nlwiki, where no sources are cited. Ping me if evidence of notability occurs. FromCzech (talk) 12:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find sources that go into enough detail to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.