The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Noting that the nominator has withdrawn their nomination also. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poola Rangadu

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and promo material.

PROD removed because "Declined g11", but it have no other sources other then external links which are used as sources..--Filmomusico (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I declined the G11. There was no PROD. The movie looks notable enough, although the Plot section is gibberish.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bbb23: We need at least two reliable sources to make it worthwhile of inclusion. Reliable sources for a Bollywood films are: The Hindu, The Times of India, Deccan Chronicle, and Bollywood Hungama. I see non of those sources listing specifically this film or even mentioning it. A review from those publications would be enough, I just don't see it. Maybe there are reviews in Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam, or Hindi, but I know none of those tongues.--Filmomusico (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is this one of those rules you've made up?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't qualify WP:NFILM. I won't even count Bollywood Hungama as a good enough source for films. But I am surprised to find no reviews despite having a strong notable casting. Maybe reviews exists in other languages. But we can't assume they do and they must be presented for this page to be included at Wikipedia. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The Indian Express is also good. @Bbb23: No. This was something that was stated by a debate participant in this project for the July 13 nomination of one of the articles. I should have provided a source and quote it. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One of a large set of similar AfDs on Indian films by this nominator, none of which were transcluded to a daily log. Fixing now--I am neutral on the nominations themselves. --Finngall ^talk 16:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NFO. Mullapudi Venkata Ramana won Andhra Pradesh state-presented Nandi Award for Best Story Writer for the film.^[1] Also added a full-length review from Zamin Ryot.^[2] -- Ab207 (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "నంది అవార్డు విజేతల పరంపర (1964–2008)" [A series of Nandi Award Winners (1964–2008)] (PDF). Information & Public Relations of Andhra Pradesh. Retrieved 21 August 2020.(in Telugu)
^ Gopalrao, Griddaluru (1 December 1967). "అభిప్రాయం: పూల రంగడు" [Opinion: Poola Rangadu] (PDF). Zamin Ryot (in Telugu). p. 9.

Keep: passes WP:NFILM per WP:NFO -- DaxServer (talk) 15:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now it does. Withdrawing my nomination then. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 06:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Well developed, and has enough sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.