The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poker mustang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable. Ideogram 07:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable, related to poker dream, which does not have its own article. Some parts a bit unencyclopedic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omega Archdoom (talk • contribs).

If you can add references backing up your claims, it will be fine. --Ideogram 10:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Err, that would be a problem. WP:COI strongly discourages anyone writing about a business they have a financial interest in. If it is worth writing about, someone else will write about it. --Ideogram 11:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable, and I couldn't find a single reliable source to verify. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, verify, using reliable sources. If no reliable source has written enough about this web site to verify the accuracy of the information, then there's not enough reliable information to create an encyclopedia article. And no, the word of someone who claims to be the site owner is not a reliable source, because the conflict of interest means that the information is likely to be biased. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We do need an article on Planet Poker and we would be very grateful if you write it. I can pretty much guarantee it won't be deleted. --Ideogram 11:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Leaving aside the notability issue for a moment, it seems fairly clear from the protestations above that the article is primarily an advertisement. The originator would seem to have little or no idea of the purpose of an encyclopedia. BTLizard 11:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment. From above: "3) it's so small with almost zero players". There's the notability issue, very succinctly stated. BTLizard 11:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment. From above: "4) Peter Criss's 1982 album....can you name it?? Prob not, no one bought it, but it's listed here!

So is KiSS "The Elder" who the heck has those albums?? Why dont we exclude them items of interest as well from this site. In any rate, it doesnt matter either way, the site is there and thats that, maybe in a uear when it's bigger, we will then revist it sand include it because it's then "worthy", whatever. GmanIV 11:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Please don't WP:BITE the newbies. --Ideogram 11:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete for reasons all too obvious now. 2005 11:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete. per above. Also, is there a process to help GmanIV learn proper WP etiquette (eg not posting [1])? —Gaff ^ταλκ 11:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave him alone. Don't respond to him for a while. --Ideogram 11:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable. AniMate 11:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment note that there have been deletions from this AfD. See [2]. JulesH 17:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.