The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (A3) by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon cheats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The article is unencyclopedic and gives no substantial information. PeterSymonds | talk 10:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment PeterSymonds

This is my first article so if you think it shouldn't be there why don't you help me fix it up you may edit it for me please don't delete it.

I appreciate that. However, I don't think a list of cheats is appropriate material for an encyclopedia. See WP:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook. Thanks, PeterSymonds | talk 10:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete. Absolutely no notability. Why was this brought here? Surely it's a speedy? WWGB (talk) 10:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's derived from WP:WWIN, and therefore fails WP:CSD. PeterSymonds | talk 11:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.