The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy U

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A website that never achieved any userbase and no longer exists. Fold into the Playboy article if anything. Shii (tock) 05:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, little assertion of notability as it is. Kansan (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources from FOX News and USA Today? That seems pretty notable to me. Str8cash (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Those articles are just parroting the press release; they don't report on notability. Shii (tock) 16:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, site caused a brief news stir at launch but that can be attributed to brand recognition not actual notability of the site. Jminthorne (talk) 07:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.