The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 23:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plan of Attack (mod) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No independent references since its nomination over a year ago. Although it was a finalist for the 2006 IGF Modding Competition, this is not a claim to notability (WP:N makes no mention of competitions, but I would usually accept winners of awards to have some claim.) No sign of this PC Gamer article; in any case, multiple coverage is preferred. Marasmusine (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I believe being a finalist at the 10th Independent Games Festival is evidence of notability. It lost out to Dystopia, but I would still consider the mod notable. It's been covered by three German gaming magazines: PC Action[1] [2], PC Games [3], and GameStar [4]. Here is a profile on SteamGames.com. --Pixelface (talk) 05:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Reliable sources have covered it, nothing else to say here. User:Krator (t c) 08:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  I withdraw my nomination! I had seen the quotes on the game's website but simply couldn't find the actual magazine articles anywhere and was beginning to have my doubts. We need to get those sources integrated into the article (and not dumped into a list of external links). Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. While not all mods are notable, I believe this one is above the line. Suggest speedy closure as the nominator has also withdrawn. (jarbarf) (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.