The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Placeopedia

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How is this notable? Sources include alexa listing (pretty low) and an archive.org entry for... itself. No coverage in resliable sources is shown, so this fails GNG pretty badly, I'd say. Notability tagged since 2009, time for an axe, I think. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - failed project which apparently at no time achieved any kind of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - data is also fairly inacessable on the archive machine and this appears to be a failed project that no longer warents an entry. Jab843 (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No independent sourcing. Minor internet entity (Alexa #16 million-something-something). Carrite (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.