The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 02:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pither clan

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There do not appear to be any reliable sources that discuss this clan. Sitush (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 10:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. This clan (if it is one) might appear in this book according to GBooks, though I can't find the exact word "pither" in it using its search box. Until someone cites a few sources, WP:V is not met. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That book is by H. A. Rose - it is not a reliable source per long-standing consensus. - Sitush (talk) 16:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.