The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pipeline (magazine)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine. The article lacks related references of substance - those in article are in lists or unrelated to magazine. No non-trivial independent coverage. Article verges on advertisement.reddogsix (talk) 09:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I edited the article, removing puffery and (most, but not all) unsourced claims to see what would be left. The nom is right: no independent sources, all sources given are just phone directories, in-passing mentions, listings, etc, but nothing substantial whatsoever. Does not meet WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 12:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm unaware if there is a specific guideline for newspaper or magazines and their notability criteria, I may apply WP:NBOOK to co-validate my position. The magazine hasnt been subject of multiple non trivial works published independently from the subject, it hasn't won a major award. It hasn't been considered significant by non trivial reliable sources. It is not historically significant. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 20:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.