The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD#G1: utter twaddle. Guy (Help!) 09:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pig Goggles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Neologism, unreferenced, and quite possibly original research. Any pig goggles out there? Marasmusine 08:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom --Childzy ¤ Talk 08:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Some WP:NEO mixed with WP:HOAX and some WP:N topped of with WP:NPOV. 1redrun ^Talk 08:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - leaving out the quotation marks in your Google search would give pig goggles a fairer chance of getting hits, but nothing that applies to the article does come up anyway, so yes, it looks like someone having a laugh. Get rid of it. Lradrama 08:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.