The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. fishhead64 04:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Piece by Piece (documentary)

[edit]

non notable film 789yub 07:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Per nom, worthy of CSD A7 Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if someone can find sources for those multiple awards listed at the bottom - I can't see them on a quick skim through the organisations' sites but haven't looked thoroughly - Delete otherwise. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 15:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, because many people see even seemingly minor films and so there is a potential audience for this. Best, --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? (talk · contribs) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 17:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Per iridescenti, but needs sources.--Bryson^{Talk}^{Edits} 02:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
week delete - i hate to pull the trigger, but i cant find mention of the films 'awards,' save for the german source, making the article unreliable. imdb+seeing it at Borders makes me hesitant, but without unaffiliated media coverage/publications, it doesnt satify criteria. the_undertow ^talk 06:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Needs serious cleanup but not deletion.--St.daniel ^talk 14:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the Berlin source only mentions that the film was shown, but I was unable to find some "award". In Madrid I can't even confirm it was shown, much less that it got an award. I didn't check all the other sources, but expect them to be of like "quality". --Huon 15:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Check out its page on Rotten Tomatoes; it's been reviewed by a few significant sources including Film Threat and Variety. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has a good rating at imdb.com. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 22:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the commenters above, there is no harm in the inclusion of this article. Yamaguchi先生 01:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.