The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Basile

[edit]
Phillip Basile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination after PROD, de-PROD, re-PROD cycle. Original PROD nominator stated "not notable, lacks in-text citations, does not meet Wikipedia's quality standards" User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Not notable; owned nightclubs, possible loose connections to criminals.

Just 1 book listed, no inline citations or page #,s

Mynameisstanley (talk) 01:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Mynameisstanley[reply]

  • How references are cited is a cleanup issue. As for sources, that single book is not all there is according to Google. BTW the name is "Philip Basile." I don't know if he is a BIO1E yet, but he certainly got press attention. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, « Diligent Terrier [talk] 00:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.