The result was no consensus. This discussion comes down to a disagreement over the quality of the sources asserted to support notability, with neither side making a dispositive argument that the status quo should be changed. This defaults to the article being kept as is. bd2412 T 04:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Not notable (WP:GNG, WP:BASIC). wumbolo ^^^ 07:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)