The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter chapman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This person appears to be completely not notable in wikipedia terms. The only thing he has done is created a website featuring his research into his ancestors. The only google hits he has are for details of his ancestors on one of the genealogy sites that allow the creation of a family tree. Even the website he created doesn't turn up. The only reference is to this website, and the article appears to have been created by a relative. I fail to see how this article can be made encyclopaedic. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - So far there is nothing in the article that would make the person notable under WP:N and WP:Bio. An internet search i just performed leaves me also with no evidence for notability under Wikipedia terms. Iqinn (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.