The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pet post secret

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Google search shows it. Alexf505 (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks notability. reddogsix (talk) 08:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the book is actually called The PetPost Secret by Radhika R. Dhariwal. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you search under those details it has some press.[1][2][3] So an article could be written. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 'some press' does not mean it meets WP:BOOK. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Alexf505 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the book lacks significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NBOOK. As mentioned above the existing article title does not match the book. It was first published in 2014, and reissued under the title The tale of a no-name squirrel in 2016. --Bejnar (talk) 02:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.