The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pentax K-7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom for IP editor, rationale: based upon rumour and speculation; no reliable source; in fact, no source at all. no opinion from myself. ascidian | talk-to-me 21:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as crystal ball speculation. There are almost no concrete details regarding this product. Once released, then it could justify it's own article. Also funny that according to the article, this camera was announced on May 21, 2009. Surely a typo, unless Pentax found a way to manipulate time... JogCon (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is likely April 21: [1]. Anyway, I am deleting the unreferenced date. Mukadderat (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, first ref link is broken. second and third refs do not even have a word "K-7". Mukadderat (talk) 23:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • P.S. For this reason I deleted, like, 97% of the text. Unreferenced crystall ball has no place here. there is enough rumor and speculation on the subject in blogs already. Mukadderat (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.