The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pekro- (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The cited reference is to a proposal, not to an official SI document, and cannot be regarded as a WP:RS Mayalld (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I think the official prefixes are described as far as yocto. The linked reference is really a proposal by a person, not even an organisation. Note that we also have Nekto- etc... NerdyNSK (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless reliably sourced. Also, should be removed from Non-SI prefix if not sourced. DCEdwards¹⁹⁶⁶ 19:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. According to BIPM, these are not in official use. The prefixes, as proposed, seem to exist solely on somebody's mindspring.com web page. This isn't the place for things made up one day. I can't even call WP:CRYSTAL on this. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. John254 00:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.