- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Pavlo Petrov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable photographer, I'm not showing coverage in detail in any RS. Oaktree b (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Journalism, News media, and Ukraine. Skynxnex (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think it would be important for a user who can do research in Ukranian sources to weigh in here before making a decision. Moreover, the article indicates that his photographs have been featured in a few exhibitions, which might meet WP:PHOTOGRAPHER if those exhibitions were significant; it's hard for me to know as someone who can't easily access Ukranian sources. Additionally, I found at least one reliable source in English which is arguably WP:SIGCOV. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Petrov is not the main subject of the listed sources, so the article does not meet WP:GNG. 128.6.36.94 (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC
- Draftify. I've reviewed every source listed in the Ukrainian wiki page for the subject, as well as tried searching for news articles and books in Ukrainian for his name. It seems that the only significant coverage of the subject is the Time article mentioned by @Voorts. With just one qualified source, honestly not much can be written about him. I recommend having the other sources and claims not supported by the Time article deleted, draftify the article, and only publish it into the main space when there are more coverage of the subject. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you @Tutwakhamoe! Given your review of the sources, and the potential for the subject to become notable at some point in his career, I agree with your proposal to draftify. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Draftify per Tutwakhamoe. Not enough in-depth secondary coverage in reliable sources. Simply having your photos used in notable publications does not make you a notable photographer. The awards and exhibitions help a bit, but they still aren't enough to establish notability. Could be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Mooonswimmer 15:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.