The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kantorek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is an orphan page with questionable notability. I see no evidence of noteworthiness with a number of related google searches. I wouldn't be surprised if Paul Kantorek put this article here himself. Timneu22 (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete google turns up two wikipedia pages as top hits for this "author", and nothing else. Not notable. Fuzbaby (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I, too, find no evidence of notability. Even non-notable professors tend to show up in google scholar searches much more heavily than this guy; I see only two syllabi and one passing mention of this guy in one other source. Cazort (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. There was apparently a famous marathon runner circa 1962 named Dr. Pavel Kantorek. According to this page, the subject of the article here would have been around 20 at that time, well before he received his Ph.D. Any relation? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If he's notable otherwise, it's as a writer in czech, where the czech WP lists about a dozen books; he does seem to have written most of that article himself. I have no way to tell how notable a Czech children's book might be. DGG (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable per Wikipedia standards. Drawn Some (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.