The result was keep. It's clear that this group is notable, thanks to the given sources. (X! · talk) · @701 · 15:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am fixing this broken nomination by Da Killa Wabbit and am not expressing any opinion myself -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 20:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Internet trolls, an offshoot of the GNAA and 4chan. They exist strictly to troll SL and other venues, in addition to a passing notability outside of SL. This article seems to serve primarily to glorify them. It's been speedily deleted twice already, this version looks as if it's sourced but the sourced are not substantially about this group, just about the phenomenon of people getting their kicks by disrupting gameplay, with one or two namechecks as examples of a griefer group. A redirect might be appropriate, but this group appears to me to fail any independent measure of notability by a fair margin. Da Killa Wabbit (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Notice that WP:DENY is about vandals that damage wikipedia, not about articles that deal with vandalic organizations. For this article we should use WP:ORG because it's an organization WP:CLUB since it's a non-commercial organization. The activities of PN have been reported by third-party, independient, reliable sources, so it passes that guideline.
To closing admin, please remember to apply rough consensus instead of head counting. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]