The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pascal (programming language). Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pascal-p2

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not notable. No references are included and a WP:BEFORE search shows only downloads and unrelated items (not notable for a Wikipedia article). -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 20:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been up about an hour before being marked for deletion. I assume this is a robot marking for deletion. It's a work in progress. Chill out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samiam95124 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I read through the notability article. Pascal-p2 is a piece of software written in 1972 by Niklaus Wirth and his university group. It was the basis for many Pascal compilers, including many that have pages here in Wikipedia (a search here will show that). I created it as a SourceForge project because I wanted it archived as a software source that is important to the history of computing. It is referenced here in Wikipedia many times, and I thought it deserved a page on it's history and implementation, instead of just appearing as a series of links that go elsewhere.

Your choice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samiam95124 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 23:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 23:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The reference section of the article does not conform to standards. The links are simply redirects to one website. Lack of validation. Lack of quality. Ventric (talk) 00:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pascal (programming language) (section: Implementations; subsection: The Pascal-P system) looks like the best solution if no more RS are found about this particular Pascal implementation. @Samiam95124: aren´t there some books/papers about Pascal-P2 not written by its authors? That would help to keep stand-alone article. Pavlor (talk) 09:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 20:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pascal (programming language). Still not that non-notable. D4iNa4 (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.