The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parul Sharma

[edit]
Parul Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed speedy, some claims on notability in article and quite few results on google. Is this worth keeping? No !vote from me, I want to see other's opinions. Peter 20:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)



Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In consideration of the quantity and quality of the present sources, what purpose is served by continuing to leave this discussion open? Emily Jensen (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.