The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Conference Bike. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Party Bike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is listed under the category "Cycle Types" but it is NOT about a type of cycle. It is a page about a private bike-tour company in New York City. This particular company ("Party Bike NYC") does not meet any notability standards for inclusion. Regarding the 'merge' notice on the page, this company apparently used Conference Bikes as well as traditional quadrycles in its services ... however, there is nothing to merge as this page doesn't add anything to those topics beyond the fact that this particular company used them. MidnightDesert (talk) 09:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Conference Bike, which this apparently is according to the links. It appears that "party bike" [1] is what this is called by some press accounts, while others refer to the conference bike [2], so it's a legitimate search term. Mandsford 14:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Conference Bike as above: I have put a mention in the Conference Bike article, which I have also pruned, depuffed and tided.Springnuts (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• REdirect as suggested: this looks the best solution to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.