The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paradiso fp7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Written like an advertisement, but not sure if it qualifies for speedy. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This article is very useful for International Cooperation on ICT Research. You shouldn't delete it. Thanks and regards, Mr Prior Vich — Preceding unsigned comment added by PARADISO-fp7 (talk • contribs)
• Speedy Delete as spam. It seems like pretty blatant advertising. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It reads like marketing collateral, not an encyclopedia article. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (speedy?) as marketing material aka spam. JBsupreme (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.