The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paradis (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable magazine. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as searches found nothing better and none of this suggests better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly unnotable magazine. — Music1201 ^talk 05:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A magazine which has produced 6 issues in a decade, most recently 4 years ago. Searches show some mention, but relative to its founder more than in its own right. I guess the question is whether the 321 word piece from International Herald Tribune in March 2007 confers lasting notability: I would see it more as a brief notice, as much about founder as magazine, and certainly insufficient to stand alone as a demonstration of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.