The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PANDEAN diet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this is a WP:NOTABLE product Boleyn (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the three links in the article are dead, web searches turn up links to pet food sites, no independent coverage. Fails WP;GNG. Kraxler (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Most likely spam. (Ironically, Spam sounds like the exact opposite of what this diet claims.) I could find no published information about this supposed diet anywhere. Searching Google finds one pet food company (the same one which is the source of the dead links in the article). Nothing at all at Google News, Books, or Scholar. --MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.