The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of numbered comets#270P. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 09:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P/1997 C1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only coverage is from databases and the announcements about the discoveries[1], the orbital elements revisions [2][3] and the assosiation with a latter apparition [4] and thus the comet was numbered (it is 270P/Gehrels). They may sound enough, but this is just routine coverage for a numbered comet, and thus fails in WP:NASTCRIT, according to which multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object are needed (eg. it doesn't have a dedicated page in Kronk's cometography). 270P/Gehrels is currently a redirect to List of numbered comets#270P and so this could become a redirect to that page too, with a note that a more appropriate page name exists (with template ((R avoided double redirect))). C messier (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom. Only found a bunch of data about the subject, does not seem to be notable. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of numbered comets#270P as an ((R avoided double redirect)): coverage is WP:ROUTINE and there are not enough sources to establish notability per WP:NASTCRIT. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom.  // Timothy :: talk  04:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.