The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Owle Schreame Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a newly created theatre awards program. The only (unique) source is an article in The Stage which has been picked up in syndication by a few blogs. Lacks significant coverage as required by WP:GNG. - MrX 12:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There is significant additional coverage; it just wasn't listed yet in the less-than-24-hours-old stub. Softlavender (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now -- As a new award, it has no winners yet, but it may well want it in due course (when it has). I therefore regard it as harmless. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I agree with Peterkingiron, and in case this AfD results in a deletion consensus, I recommend userfying it, so that once the awards get underway, if they become significantly more notable we won't have to reinvent the wheel to recreate the article. Softlavender (talk) 22:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- There's coverage across National, Industry, Local and Academic press. This constitutes significant. The notability is attested to in said coverage, and (as already stated by Peterkingiron and Softlavender above) notability and significance will only increase once the awards have actually been held. MarlovianPlough (talk) 00:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above TheFrontDeskMust (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.