The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Lloyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

He played three games for the Edmonton Oilers? I don't see anything significant about such a feat, except evidence of a general bias on Wikipedia towards sports and entertainment figures. Owen (talk) 21:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have no issue with his playing in the 1970s. I just don't find "professional athlete" makes him a shoe-in for a Wikipedia article, any more than does being a professional plumber. That he only played three games suggests his professional career as a football player was less than notable, and this article offers no evidence to the contrary. Owen (talk) 22:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Calling the guidelines suggestions is a bit of an understatement. They're standards, supported by consensus, that Wikipedia editors are generally expected to follow. There may be rare occasions when it's right to ignore the guidelines, but these are usually cases where following the letter of the policy or guideline would violate the spirit of it. That's not the case here. I believe WP:ATHLETE has it more or less right, that it's not justifiable to ignore the guideline on this occasion, and that Mr. Lloyd is notable enough to be included in this encyclopedia. Reyk YO! 22:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tend to be more of a deletionist, however I think that it is perfectly likely that any professional sports player, past or present, would be researched by Wikipedia users. As such, we should provide as much of a resource as possible. At least he's not a reality TV star.  :) Addionne (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.