The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Outloud Apps

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP WP:PROMO and WP:GNG. Third-party sources are a bit suspect. Both "Company products" and "Background information" are promotional in tone. Searching for the company on google results in more hits for a jukebox app than for a speech therapy app. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google News had nothing, and there was one hit in Google Books but it did not show the company name in bold in the snippet. The article has personal opinion in Wikipedia's voice, and is using sourcing from Facebook. fi.lynkos.com indicates that the company has 1 to 10 employees. There might be sources in Finnish, but since the company was founded in late 2013, such sources would need to satisfy both WP:CORP and WP:SUSTAINED. Unscintillating (talk) 00:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is basically actual speedy material regardless of the "major" claims the article has, because it's still both unconvincing for notability and then it's absolute advertising. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.