The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines Davewild (talk) 16:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outburst UK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Selfpub / Vanity article - see the comment on the talk page. Contested prod. Organization is non-notable, no WP:RS. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: OutburstUK Black Pride Festival is somewhat related to this. — Byeitical (talk · contribs) 06:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article looks like SPAM. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 03:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable article created by someone with a conflict of interest with the subject. Maybe in a few years. I've also left a note on the author's talk page about our COI guideline. — Byeitical (talk · contribs) 06:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable organization, with some advertising thrown in. TN‑X-Man 13:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.