The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 07:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OpenDevelop GNU/Linux

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

I've nominated this in July and the AfD was closed due to lack of consensus. Actually there was [little] consensus, but Sandstein's real concern seems to have been that the claim that the topic was not notable was not backed. Sorry, I thought this would be obvious. So: No reliable sources found to establish notability. More convincingly, a "notable" Linux distribution should get at least 50 thousand preliminary hits on Google. "OpenDevelop GNU/Linux" gets only 163. To be fair, since this name is long, I checked OpenDevelop Linux -wikipedia , which only gets 246 preliminary hits. Chealer 05:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Some notability, but not quite as nom mentioned. --H irohisat ^Talk 06:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure if not being on distrowatch.com warrants deletion, but I can't find this disto there either. FrozenPurpleCube 06:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being on it won't make it notable, but not being on something like that probably doesn't help its claim to notability. KTC 09:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn, with no reliable secondary sources. KTC 09:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 09:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.