The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. This should stand or fall with the article about the author, Tabitha King, which is currently at AfD and, I suggest, likely to result in the retention of the article. Even if it doesn't, this has received national-level attention from the American media and I suggest it easily meets notability standards. UbelowmeUMe02:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Perhaps you'll find the cited reviews from Entertainment Weekly, the Chicago Tribune, the Arizona Daily Star and Publishers Weekly more relevant. UbelowmeUMe00:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To be specific, I'm suggesting that the book, One on One, which is the subject of this AfD, meets criterion #1 of WP:BKCRIT, which I believe is the relevant standard. The book does so by dint of the national-level cited reviews I noted above; it doesn't really matter who wrote it. Although I do not suggest that Ms. King meets criterion #5, it says that, yes, books do in some cases inherit notability from their authors. UbelowmeUMe04:53, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.