The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Synthetic languages. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oligosynthetic_language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This term is not very notable. There is only one reference listed. The content of this page could be transferred to different articles such as Synthetic language or Benjamin Lee Whorf if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LesVisages (talk • contribs) 17:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect to Synthetic languages. Whorf's proposal is a marginal footnote in the history of linguistics. Lacks notability for a standalone. –Austronesier (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Austronesier. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 14:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.