The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Because Draft:ORDO Store had already been declined, and then rejected, a copy of it in main space should have been merged back over draft so that it could be improved and eventually accepted for submission. The draft still exists. The reviewer who rejected it could be contacted to reconsider if there is potential for improving it. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ORDO Store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ORDO Store

This article was declined in Articles for Creation, and then moved into article space, and moved back into draft space as not ready for article space, but a copy has been created in article space anyway. This article does not satisfy WP:NCORP. It has been reference-bombed, and the references have not been analyzed in depth for significant coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Albania. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This one is so obviously far from Wikipedia's standards that a discussion for deletion should not be held. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just an ad, no reason for it to be here. Jhhillman (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete my personal favorite ref is "Government document". Rest are listings, their own website/blog and various passing mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I did notify the article author. They deleted the AFD notice from their talk page, which is their privilege and indicates that they have seen it. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• CommentHello everyone. I hope you are very good. I am so glad to be here and this is wonderful to be here. I am so sorry about all this noise I have made with these writings but I just have tried to do all my best. This is my second article I did and this is all about not to doing right. This is a company in my country and I have nothing to do with it, also I have nothing to do about it in paid article. I just registered on Wikipedia and I loved this place here. That is all about it. I tried to see many videos about how to write an article in the perfect way so I tried to. All of them said "you need many references" so I tried to find a lot of. I hope will not do anything wrong if I will try to add something else about Albanian interests. Sorry again for everything I did wrong Nrt0011 (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Nrt0011 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Nrt0011, no new editor gets everything right with their first few articles. Take this AFD as a learning experience. Listen to what experienced editors identify as problems which will help you avoid these problems in the future. It's not about getting things perfect, it's about improving as an editor. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• owner of the business - hello everyone. i am rubin qatja. i am the brother of one of the owners of this business. this business is working and already everything presented here is right. i dont know to talk about wikipedia rules and so, but i know that this is real business and i am ready to present any kind of documents if needed. i am so happy you added this business here. i want this business to be here not because of any marketing or something like this some editors told me. if this business is here or it is not here there is zero marketing on it and we will not earn more money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gru088 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Gru088 (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed. [reply]

@Gru088: Your business is not entitled to have an article on Wikipedia just because it exists. Only companies that meet Wikipedia's notability criteria are considered worthy of inclusion. An article about a non-notable business will be considered promotional and subject to deletion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as entirely a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL organisation. Not everything or everyone that exists merits a Wikipedia article. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP no in-depth significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails to show special notability as a company. While the company obviously existed, it has not shown enough notability for a standalone article. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.