The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nykieria chaney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This person does not meet the criteria for inclusion. Besides the COI (see signature added at bottom of article), the original reserach, peacock terms there are no multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Although a short story is in a magazine and a poem is on the web this doesn't meet the above criteria. It is mentioned that she has performed at open mic "hot spots" (though who considers them hot spots is not cited) but this is largely trivial. DFS454 (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete puff page. pablo_hablo. 22:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Alpha 4615 (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and the speedy the nom originally placed on it was a good one, both as A7 no possible notability and as G11 advertising. DGG (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Hogvillian (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.