The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDAduel 20:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear Politics in America[edit]

Nuclear Politics in America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable book. Not the subject of non-trivial reviews, sales, awards, etc. No evidence that it is anything more than a well-regarded textbook. Doesn't deserve its own Wikipedia article. ScienceApologist (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC) *Comment I'm pretty sure that well-enough-regarded textbooks are notable by dint of being well-enough-regarded. It would be well to check this. Nyttend (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.