The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not just for profit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO. There is some third-party usage of the term, but those few sources actually identifying it as a term appear to be Wikimirrors [1] and/or possible copyvios [2], although I suspect the latter is a violation of WIkipedia's license, not the other way around. j⚛e decker^talk 18:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and it is an essay. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as unreferenced essay. Mangoe (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.