The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The consensus below is that the subject does not meet any of our inclusion criteria in WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noorhaidi_Hasan

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Noorhaidi Hasan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:PROF; the article makes no claim for notability other than he is a scholar with some articles and a book. ErikHaugen (talk) 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —ErikHaugen (talk) 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. —Satu Suro 01:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - the Indonesian project had numerous stubs that have a lot less WP:N and WP:V that remain unchallenged - I remain unconvinced that this article is deletable - there are some avenues not yet pursued to ascertain notability within the Indonesian context SatuSuro 02:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What WP:N does this have? Were his books/papers influential? ErikHaugen (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. GS cites 41, 13, 5, 5,3..... so does not do well on WP:Prof #1. I am not familiar with citation patterns in Indonesian studies. Notable in general terms, articulate scholar in an important area. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- What do you mean by "notable in general terms"? I might be gettin' carried away with the AfDs, so let me know! Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no indication of notability per WP:ANYBIO so a notability case would have to be made under WP:PROF. The citation results are pretty low; similarly the library holdings of his books are also fairly low[1][2][3][4]. Not enough here to make a case for satisfying criterion 1 of WP:PROF. I don't see evidence of passing any other criteria of WP:PROF (such as significant awards, etc). Nsk92 (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nsk92. Pete.Hurd (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.