The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noobish Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article violates WP:ORG with no clear evidence of significant coverage in secondary sources that are reliable, and independent of the subject. Also appears to be significantly promotional in nature. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 19:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Non-notable company. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Self-promotion of a non-notable label. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. and WP:ORG. JohnCD (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.