The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nizaam Hartley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable wrestler with none-barely any information/references in the article iMatthew 2008 15:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —iMatthew 2008 16:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only mention in an indepedent source is as part of a list. No coverage of Hartley himself (or herself, as the one-sentence article doesn't even clarify this much). Non-notable. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and GCF. –LAX 22:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. When an article doesn't even confirm gender then you know it is not notable. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Ajstyles tna roh (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.