The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗plicit 11:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai von Bismarck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost all coverage here relates to his relationship with Kate Moss. (This was stripped from the article by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, on questionable grounds) This sort of "Who is x famous celebrity's new boyfriend/girlfriend" tabloid coverage is routine and doesn't make them notable. Being minor nobility doesn't make on notable either. The Telegraph piece is independent but is an interview, which only questionably counts towards notability. I think a redirect to Kate Moss is probably appropriate. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment these may prove helpful to help establish notability as a photographer: [1] and [2]. And while this one is about his relationship, it isn't tabloid coverage: [3] -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep per sources above. Whilst these are interviews, they are not verbatim interview transcripts but instead quotes interspersed with journalistic prose and just about get across the line for significant coverage based on the journalists who are writing and providing independent, reliable coverage. FOARP (talk) 14:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.