The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Niko Omilana. As there seems to be substantial interest in a marge, history will be left intact to make this possible. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Niko Defence League

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The NDL is not notable and the citations are about the founder, Niko Omilana, with the party being incidental. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The citations have no relation to the founder, including the media companies and the articles, and it is notable since the organization/political party was involved in the 2021 London mayoral elections. RowanJ LP (talk) 03:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I see what you meant, do you think it would be better to create an article about Niko Omilana, and merge the NDL article with that article? RowanJ LP (talk) 04:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend, RowanJ LP, yes, I think that would be best. Good idea. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So do I have permission to create an article about Niko Omilana? RowanJ LP (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, RowanJ LP, you don't need permission to create any article. All that will matter is the notability of the subject and the quality of the page. My advice would be to start a Niko Omilana page in your sandbox, and in the meantime see what other editors think here. User:Epluribusunumyall is already onboard with this approach. I'm now very open to it. Very sincere regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the article, but it's already Semi-protected, anyway to get the silverlock topicon on top of the article? RowanJ LP (talk) 18:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the article was previously deleted in 2019. -Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge into the article about the founder Niko Omilana. The articles content almost entirely centers around Niko and his previous run for Mayor, information which can be well covered in an article for its founder. There's no reason for a standalone article. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to create a article on him but it keeps on getting turned into a redirect, and I'm not good for arguing for articles, any help on helping me get the page not turned into a redirect? RowanJ LP (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - GA Melbourne (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This article can't be Merged into Niko Omilana as that page is a Redirect as the result of a previous AFD. Is there another plausible Merge or Redirect target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i think no. this has become a cultural icon and we can not reemove it. I think we should make one about him as he is considered a politician after running in 2021. Anoymousgamer (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Niko Omilana: The topic isn't notable in of itself. I have reinstated Niko Omilana (after achieving consensus), therefore it is now possible to redirect this page there. - GA Melbourne (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't achieve consensus, you posed a question on an article talk page and a couple of people commented over the course of a few hours That's not a consensus to undo an AFD decision. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its was over the course of a week. - GA Melbourne (talk) 10:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we must keep the Niko Defense League page. It's a political party and is a world wide movement of people who support Niko Omilana. It should stay. If it leaves then the Conservative Party and Labour Party must also leave. It will also be racism against black humans because you won't get rid of the English Defense League. Wikipedia should be a place of all articles, and it would be bad for Wikipedia if they become racist and remove the anti-racist organization. Anoymousgamer (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The NDL is a major politcal movement rivaling the English Defense League . It would be wrong to keep it off. Anoymousgamer (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.