The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Nike football boots. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nike Total 90 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 5 out of 6 references being unreliable. Soccer Cleats, where one citation is from is a blog. Footy-Boots.com, where 4 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The final reference literally details the history of the brand and equipment through Nike adverts. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath^talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football. TarnishedPath^talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to a new article on Nike football boots or similar, which would be a notable general topic. GiantSnowman 10:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting redirecting an article to another redirect, GiantSnowman? I haven't encountered that option before. Or are you going to write this Currently nonexistent article?

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was an article - redirected - now restored. GiantSnowman 07:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.