The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Mandsford 17:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nihon Koden Shindo Ryu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A mediocre article which should have been deleted the first AFD nomination, it is completely lacking in reliable sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Jakejr (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I didn't find any independent sources that show this is a notable martial arts style. The articles I found were either connected to this style or mirrors of WP. Jakejr (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I found the same thing as Jakejr. Papaursa (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not demonstrate notability. Janggeom (talk) 07:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Added to the correct dated log on 04-Jan-2011. Jarkeld (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.