The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, bordering on speedy keep due to the superficial nomination statement. It's an official Doctor Who project — those don't sink into obscurity even when they become lost media — and it's already amply cited. In a case like this, an AfD nomination needs to make an effort to explain why the obvious factors counting in the article's favor somehow don't. XOR'easter (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just because its an official Doctor Who project doenst make it notable.
Technically it doesn't, but in practice, it kind of does. Topics become notable when people write about them in reliable sources, which happens with cultural mainstays like Doctor Who rather a lot of the time. Some of the more niche-interest topics, like one-off minor characters and settings visited only in passing, might not need a whole article. That's why we have List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens and so forth. At worst, Night of the Doctor would be a candidate for merging, not deletion. XOR'easter (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same story as with above about the dvd release, it does talk about it for a paragraph, and not particularly indebth more like a plot summary. Of these sources none of them are particularly great. So Delete is the proper course of action Questions?fourOlifanofmrtennant (she/her)20:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I honestly don't see the issue with the article, either. Furthermore, this is a part of Doctor Who canon. In "The Husbands of River Song", in the final scene, River discusses with the Twelfth Doctor about why he kept cancelling their date to Darillium. During this, she mentions the "night there were two of you", a reference to the "Last Night" episode. This is also referenced in the episode's Wikipedia article under "Continuity" - a sourced reference - and that has never been questioned or challenged. So, if one of these interconnected mini-stories is connected to the main show's canon, then they all are connected. As such, this entire collection is canonical and notable. Ooznoz (talk) 05:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Ooznoz[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.